I read the article, “ Stupidity of Computers ,” by David Auerbach. Auerbach starts the article by stating that computers are, “near-omnipotent cauldrons of processing power.” Sounds like a good thing, huh? I couldn't understand why he would call a good thing sutpid. Well, after reading further, I have several thoughts on why he called what sounds like a good thing (reads: a computer) stupid. A popular saying goes "progress is a slow process; but, I don't have anything but time." To put it plainly, the saying means, "I must and am doing all of the good things that I want to do, just like I should." and, I'd like to add my conclusion to the old saying, "when I can think of more than one good thing, I move more slowly." I thought t o speed up any process or processes would be a convenience. I didn't understand why a convenience would be talked about in a disrespectful or loathsome way. Auerbach says computers have near-omnipot...
Comments
Post a Comment